Make
Visual no-code automation with 3,000+ app integrations
VS
n8n
Self-hosted automation platform with full code support

Make vs n8n (2026): Which Is Better?

Make provides a comprehensive no-code automation platform with 3,000+ integrations designed for business users, while n8n offers a developer-focused platform with self-hosting capabilities and full code support. Make emphasizes visual workflow building for non-technical users, whereas n8n combines visual workflows with the ability to write custom code when needed.

Last updated: Mar 2026 · Data sourced directly from vendor pages

Decision Shortcut
  • If you want extensive app integrations → Make
  • If you want self-hosting control → n8n
  • If you want code-in-workflows flexibility → n8n

Find Your Fit

Beginners
Make's visual no-code workflow builder requires no technical expertise compared to n8n's code-when-needed approach.
Make
Hobbyists
Make's extensive integration ecosystem and visual interface better serves personal automation projects without technical complexity.
Make
Solo Creators
Make's 3,000+ integrations and marketing-focused features better support freelancer workflows and client automation needs.
Make
Students
Make's visual no-code approach has a lower learning curve for students compared to n8n's technical requirements.
Make
Small Business
Make's extensive integrations and business operations focus better serve small business automation needs without technical overhead.
Make
Marketing Teams
Make specifically targets marketing operations teams with relevant integrations and growth operations capabilities.
Make
Developers
n8n's full code support, self-hosting options, and technical flexibility better serve experienced developers' automation needs.
n8n
Enterprise
n8n's self-hosting capabilities and faircode license provide better data sovereignty and deployment control for enterprise requirements.
n8n

Scorecard

4
Make
1
Both
0
n8n

Make dominates in integration breadth and user accessibility, making it ideal for business teams seeking comprehensive no-code automation. n8n leads in technical flexibility and deployment control, serving developers and enterprises requiring code customization and self-hosting capabilities.

Entry Accessibility
Both tools offer free plans, though Make provides a permanent free tier while n8n offers a free trial.
Both
Feature Depth
Make provides 3,000+ integrations and comprehensive AI toolkit compared to n8n's 500+ integrations.
Make
Value for Audience
Make offers more integrations and business-focused features at $10.59/mo compared to n8n's $24/mo starting price.
Make
Audience Breadth
Make wins 6 of 8 audience types vs n8n's 2, with 0 ties.
Make
Team Fit
Make provides real-time execution monitoring and visual workflows better suited for team collaboration and business operations.
Make
Full Comparison

Make vs n8n: At a Glance

Feature
Make
n8n
Starting Price
$10.59/mo
$24/mo
Free Tier
Free Plan
Free Trial
Pricing Model
Freemium
Free Trial
Best For
Marketing operations teams, Customer success managers, No-code automation agencies, Growth operations specialists
Technical teams, developers, and IT/DevOps practitioners who need to automate complex multi-step workflows, build and deploy AI agents with LLM integrations, and require the flexibility to self-host or embed automation into their own products.
Platforms
Web, API, Slack
Web, API, Self-hosted
Category
Automation
Automation

Key Differences

  • Make offers 3,000+ app integrations vs n8n's 500+ integrations
  • n8n provides self-hosting options with faircode license while Make is cloud-based
  • n8n supports full JavaScript and Python code within workflows while Make is primarily no-code
  • Make targets marketing and business operations teams while n8n focuses on technical teams and developers
  • n8n requires technical setup for self-hosting while Make is ready-to-use

When to Choose Each Tool

MakeChoose Make if…
  • ✓Marketing operations teams needing extensive third-party app integrations
  • ✓Customer success managers automating client workflows
  • ✓No-code automation agencies building solutions for clients
  • ✓Growth operations specialists requiring visual workflow builders
n8nChoose n8n if…
  • ✓Technical teams requiring self-hosted automation solutions
  • ✓Developers needing to embed custom code in workflows
  • ✓IT/DevOps practitioners building complex multi-step automations
  • ✓Organizations requiring data sovereignty through self-hosting

Features

Make
  • Visual No-Code Workflow Builder
  • 3,000+ App Integrations
  • Make AI Agents
  • Make AI Toolkit
  • Real-Time Execution Monitoring
n8n
  • Visual Workflow Builder
  • Code-When-You-Need-It (JS & Python)
  • 500+ Pre-Built Integrations & HTTP Request Node
  • AI Agent Builder
  • RAG System Builder

Pros & Cons

Make — Pros
  • ✓Extensive Integration Ecosystem Available
  • ✓Visual No-Code Workflow Builder
  • ✓Comprehensive AI Integration Capabilities
Make — Cons
  • ✗Significant Feature Complexity for Beginners
  • ✗Restrictive Free Tier Limitations
  • ✗Technical Expertise Required for Advanced Features
n8n — Pros
  • ✓Self-hosting with a faircode license
  • ✓500+ pre-built integrations plus an HTTP fallback
  • ✓Full code support inside the visual canvas
n8n — Cons
  • ✗Cloud entry tier is tightly capped
  • ✗Dedicated support is Enterprise-only
  • ✗Self-hosting requires technical setup and maintenance
Final Verdict

Make excels as a comprehensive no-code automation platform with extensive integrations for business users, while n8n serves technical teams requiring code flexibility and self-hosting control. Make suits organizations prioritizing ease of use and broad connectivity, whereas n8n fits teams needing technical customization and deployment flexibility.

AISH may earn a commission from affiliate links on this page. This never influences our analysis or verdicts. All tool data is sourced directly from vendor websites.

Engine-analysed, not scraped
No paid placements
Pricing verified against source
Editorially independent